14.      Section 26. -  This section relates to cases in which the amount or value of the instrument chargeable with ad valorem duty is indeterminate .

Where no limit is defined in a security bound , or the limit is exceeded , the instrument falls under schedule  1-A article 57(b) and a fixed duty is payable  thereon.

15.      Section 27. -  Enacts that the consideration and all facts affecting the stamp duty shall be set forth in the instrument. It should be noted that section 64 makes any intentional evasion of the requirements of this section in  order to avoid paying stamp – duty punishable with a fine which may extend to Rs. 5000.

16.      Section 29  - determines, in the case of certain classes of instruments , the parties by whom, in the absence  of an agreement to the contrary, the stamp-duty is payable, and only needs special notice in this place , with reference to its effect in connection with the first proviso to section 3, which exempts from stamp-duty “ any instrument  executed by, or on behalf of ,or in favour of Government in cases where, but for this exemption, the Government would be liable to pay the duty chargeable in respect of such instrument.”

In determining whether an instrument to which Government is a party comes under this exemption , regard must be had to section 29.  In the case  of a sale or lease of waste land by the Government , the stamp duty would be payable by the grantee or lessee ,and the exemption would not apply; neither would it in the case of a mortgage deed executed in favour of Government  sanads of jagirs and conveyances of land without pecuniary consideration are exempted by Government of India notification no. 6 stamps, dated 12th September, 1931 , reproduced in chapter 1 of this part. In the case of ferry tolls and such like, it is usual for the Deputy Commissioner to grant a lease or patta , and to take counterpart or kabuliat from the lessee specifying the conditions of the lease and agreeing to pay certain sums to the Government treasury periodically. Now ,as the stamp duty on a lease is payable under section 29  by lessee, and that on the counterpart by the lessor, the general exemption applies to the kabuliat, but not to the patta, the duty on which would have to be paid by the lessee.
17.      Section 30. -   It should be borne in mind that  under section 65 any person who, on being required to give a receipt, refuses or neglects to give the same , or who, with intent to defraud Government is guilty of any devices to evade the payment of duty on receipts , renders himself liable to a  fine which may extend to Rs. 100 . See also proviso(b) to section 35 of the Act. There seems to an impression among certain trade’s people that a “ cash-memo” for whatever amount need not be stamped. That however, is not the law, A cash memo is a ‘receipt under the Indian Stamp Act, and if the amount exceeds Rs. 20 will require a one anna stamp.

Receipts for salaries , wages, etc , are not exempt, so also vouchers for discount paid to stamp vendors on sale of stamps. For exemptions see reduction and remissions in chapter 1 of this part.

18.      Section 31. - The Collector alone is authorised  to decide as to the duty chargeable under this section , and his decision Is final . But if in doubt he should refer under section 56 to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority . no penalty for  insufficient stamping, beyond the deficient duty and the adjudication fee is leviable  when the document is unstamped or insufficiently stamped and is taken to the Collector under section 31. Care should be taken to  ensure that advantage is not taken to cover intentional evasion of the law which should be prosecuted under chapter VII  of the Act , or cases in which a civil suit is about to be founded and which should be subjected to penalty.( See chapter IV.)

19.  Section 32. – The effect of this section is to make the order of adjudication by the Collector , as endorsed upon the instrument, final, the duty payable under this section is paid in cash. The proviso is important , and if and instrument is brought after the period allowed, it cannot be endorsed nor  can any adjudication fee be charged.

20.      Chapter IV.--- The provisions of this chapter are very important and the procedure  detailed in it might for convenience of be briefly summarised here. By section 33 all public officers, with certain exceptions , are required to examine every instrument chargeable with duty which comes before them in the performance of their official functions, and to impound any instrument  which appears not to be duly stamped. Under section 35 the instruments may be admitted in evidence in a court, if the party desiring to use it , shall pay the necessary stamp duty together with a penalty of Rs. 5, or when ten times the deficiency exceeds Rs. 5 then a penalty of  ten times such amount. If the court is doubtful about the amount of stamp duty leviable . it may proceed under section 60. When such a document is admitted in evidence—an the decision of the court in this matter in final(section 36) – the court should certify (Section 42) by endorsement on the instrument that the duty and penalty have been paid, and the name and residence of the person paying them. An authenticated copy of the impounded instrument admitted in evidence similarly endorsed together with the money should be sent in original to the Collector after an authorised copy has been prepared(Section 38(2) ), and retained by the court, for the officer impounding is not responsible for any damage in transit, The instrument should be returned to the court by the Collector after he has done what is required of him by the Act(Section 40(3) ). Section 42)(2) entitles the person concerned to reclaim the impounded instrument , but the  court shall not, in any circumstances, deliver it before the expiration of one month from the date of impounding it, and if the collector has certified (section 43) that its further detention is necessary , it shall not deliver it so long as such certificate is not cancelled.

Officers who are not authorised to receive evidence should send the impounded instruments to the collector in original ( Section 38(2)) in the manner indicated above.

On receipt of a copy of an instrument which has been impounded and admitted in

Evidence ,the collector should satisfy himself that the proper stamp duty has been realized, and if it has not , he may proceed under section 61 to obtain a declaration to this effect from the court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the impounding court, and thereafter proceeds as described in that section. The collector should also decide whether the person concerned ought to be prosecuted in the interests of the stamp law (section 43,61,70), and conversely whether the penalty realized or any portion of it should be refunded (section 39). When the Collector receives an instrument impounded but not admitted in evidence, he should decide whether stamp duty is leviable or whether the instrument is duly stamped already .  he should certify accordingly and his decision is final(section 40). If stamp duty be leviable  , he should require it to be paid together with the penalty provided for in section 40(1) (b) . under section 41 the collector may certify an instrument brought to him in the circumstances stated in the section All duties, penalties and other charges may be recovered under section 48 . The collector should return the document when he has done with it to the officer from whom he received it ( section 40(3) ). It should be noted that all instruments with the exceptions of receipts chargeable with the duty of one anna and in the case of promissory notes chargeable with a duty of one anna , two annas and four annas, are excluded from the provisions of section 35,40and 41 the collector cannot certify the impounded document after levying a penalty or after prosecuting the offender .

Section 34 permits an audit officer to have an unstamped receipt stamped in the course of an audit of a public account, and section35(b) allows an unstamped receipt to be admitted in evidence on payment by the person tendering it of a penalty of rupee one.

Detailed instructions issued by the High court for the guidance of courts will be found in chapter 4-D of High Court Rules and Orders, Volume IV, which is here re- produced for facility of reference :-

Attention is called to the provisions of section 33 to 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, II of 1899, in regard to instruments not duly stamped, The procedure laid down in these sections is mandatory and not discretionary; whatever discretion is permitted under the Act vests in the collector alone, after the instrument is before him, and with what the civil courts have no concern.

2.        By section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, all public officers, with certain exceptions, are required to examine every instrument chargeable with duty which comes before them in the performance of their official functions and to impound any instrument which appears not to be duly stamped, Every court impounding an instrument must forthwith note on it as ‘ impounded ,’ such note being dated and signed with the ordinary full signature of the impounding officer.

3.        Under section 35 of the same Act, every such instrument , not being an instrument chargeable with a duty of one anna or half an anna only, or a bill of exchange or promissory note, may be admitted in evidence in civil court if the party desiring to use it shall pay the amount necessary to make up the proper stamp duty, together with penalty of Rs. 5 , or when ten times the amount of the proper duty or deficient portion thereof exceeds Rs. 5 then with a penalty of ten times such duty or portion . under clause (b) of section 35, however , an unstamped receipt may be admitted in evidence against the person who has given it, on payment of a penalty of one rupee by the person tendering it.

4.        Section 42 requires that civil courts certify by endorsement on every instrument admitted  in evidence under section 35 that the proper duty and penalty have been levied in respect thereof  and shall also state the name and residence of the person paying them.

5.        Section 38 requires every civil courts to sent to the collector an authorised copy of ever impounded instrument admitted in evidence,  with a certificate in writing stating the amount of the duty and penalty levied in respect  thereof . The endorsement required by section 42 should be transcribed on such copy, when  an impounded instrument has  not been admitted in evidence whether from failure to pay the requisite duty and penalty, irrelevancy, want of registration , or other cause it must be sent in original to the collector, in such cases the provisions of section 46 sub-section (2) , are applicable , the copy to be made under this section must be retained in the custody of the court.

6.        Section 42, subsection (2) , entitles any person tendering a document on which deficient stamp duty and penalty has been levied under section 35, to  reclaim the same, but the third paragraph of  that section direct that the court shall not, under any circumstances , deliver such document before the expiration of one month from the date of  impounding it , if the collector has certified that the further detention of such document is necessary, the court shall not  deliver it until such certificate is cancelled , it is obvious that the transmission of the copy to the collector should be made with the least possible delay to enable him to make such inquiry as may be necessary within copy should be despatched  not latter than 48 hours from the time when the original is impounded.

7.        Any  duty or penalty paid under section 35, 37, 40 or 41, and by agreement under section 29, may be included in costs or other wise recovered by the person paying such duty or penalty under section 44.

21.      Section 33.—it should be noted that duty of scrutinising and if necessary, impounding documents produced is obligatory for all judicial officers, arbitrators, special commissioners, and the like, and all executive officers other than those specified in the section, under clause 2(b) of this section the High Court has delegated the duty of examining and impounding instruments to the Deputy registrar The most important object kept in view when this and the succeeding sections were framed was to stop, as far as practicable , every hole of escape from the liability which the law imposes upon  the  executants of instruments  to stamp duty, and officers should keep that object in view when dealing with all instruments coming before him. It is not an uncommon practice for  persons to produce documents improperly stamped, and on being told  that they will have to pay a specified amount by way of penalty , to withdraw the documents and forego putting them in evidence, thus escaping punishment for an offence which is not the less an offence whether they wish to use the instrument or not This  should be guarded against, The stamping of documents in the office of the Financial Commissioner, Punjab, is done strictly according to the wishes of the persons concerned, and if a document so stamped is found to be insufficiently stamped, the court or the officer before whom it is produced shall deal with the same under the provisions of this section.

Clause 3.—An Excise Inspector is not in charge of any office and cannot impound documents

The office of Returning Officer for purposes of election is not a public office for the purpose of the Act. ( Government of India notification no. 2962-F, dated 19th November 1920.)

22.      Section 35.--   The procedure for validating unstamped instruments by chapter IV of  the Act has no application to an instrument the original of which is lost and is not forthcoming as under section 35 of the Act, it is only an original unstamped instrument which can be validate by payment of stamp duty and penalty.

The admission in evidence of any unstamped document is prohibited under this section , but it does not cover the case of a copy of a document.

23.      Section 36. –This section applies to all instruments chargeable with duty , including    instruments chargeable with the duty of one anna , half an anna, bill of exchange and promissory notes.

The admission of the instrument in evidence does not relieve the person concerned from liability under section 43.

24.      Section 37. -- This section  provides for the cases where by inadvertence  a stamp     of     improper description has been used, The stamp of improper description must be one of the stamps described in the Indian Stamp Act (Punjab Government endorsement no. 1633, dated 25th June, 1900). The instructions for dealing with documents improperly stamped are contained  in rule 18 in chapter 2 of this part and should be carefully read.

25.      Section 38.  – This section treats of the manner in which instruments impounded are to be dealt with . the objet in sending the copy of the document admitted in evidence, or the original document not so admitted, is to enable the Collector to decide whether he will prosecute the person concerned – Sec sections 39,40, of the Stamp Act.

26.      Section 39.      -- if  the penalty recovered is less than Rs.5, no refund can be made, if the instrument has been written in contravention of section 13 or section 14, it shall be deemed to be unstamped ( section 15) and must be impounded if produced ( section 33) , and a penalty recovered if the document is put in evidence ( section 35. ) ; the whole of this penalty may be refunded by the Collector,

27.      Section 40.—The Collector may accept any sum less than ten times the proper duty or deficient portion thereof, whether such sum exceeds or falls short of Rs. 5 compare section 35 where the minimum penalty is Rs. 5 The decision of the Collector as to the amount of duty chargeable is final and cannot be questioned by a court.() P.L.R.131 of 1906 F.B. )

When documents are impounded and sent to the Collector under section 38, all that he need do is to look for payment of the penalty and insufficient stamp duty to the person from whose custody the documents came into the hands of the impounding officer. But stamp duty and penalty can be compulsorily levied under section 48 only from the person liable to pay the proper duty in the first instance.(Madras Stamp Manual, 1933.)

In certain document purporting to be a deed of division , the registering officer was of opinion that the value of the property divided was larger than that set forth in the document . The question was whether, after the successful prosecution of the parties, proceedings could be taken under section 40 and the insufficient stamp duty and a penalty recovered . The Board of Revenue, Madras, held that the proceedings under section 40 were still obligatory in spite of the previous prosecution.(Madras Stamp Manual, 1933.)

28.      Section 41. --- This section may be taken as supplementary of chapter III of the Stamp Act regarding adjudication . Under it an instrument must be presented within a year of execution. The safeguard is, that the collector must “ satisfied that the omission to duly stamp such instrument has been occasioned by accident, mistake, or urgent necessity.”

29.      Section 42. --- It should be noted that the fee chargeable on an application made by a person to the collector for the return of an impounded document referred to in sub-Section 2 of this section has been remitted , vide serial no. 13 of the list of reductions and remissions under the Court-fees Act (Chapter 1 of part II –c). Further it should be remembered that clause(b) to the proviso expressly declares that nothing in this section shall affect order 13, rule 9 of the code of Civil Procedure, which provides that “no document shall be returned which, by force of the decree, has become wholly void or useless.”

30.      Section 43. --- The effect of section 40 an 43 is, that everyone must be allowed an opportunity of paying the penalty before the collector exercises his discretion under section 70. Instruments should be validated after proper stamp duty and penalty have been paid notwithstanding the fact of prosecutions having been instituted in respect of them.

31.      Section 44.—Sub section (3) to this section has been added to provide that, where a party to a suit has obliged to pay stamp duty, through the default of the other party, the duty so paid may be recovered as costs and not made the subject of a separate suit, (vide Statement of Objects and reasons.)

32.      Section 45.--- (1) The effect to of sub section (2) is to give an informal right of appeal from the Collector to the commissioner of the division or the chief controlling Revenue authority , as the case may be, When ordering a refund of excess duty , order should also be passed or refund of a sum equal to the court fee paid on the application . ( Government of India , finance department, no. 1297- S . R., dated 7th march, 1902)

(2)       Commissioner of divisions in the Punjab have been empowered to grant refunds—

 (i)       under sub section (1) when the mount of the penalty refunded does not exceeds Rs. 500 and

(ii)       under sub section (2) when the amount of the excess stamp duty does not exceed Rs. 50.

(Punjab Government notification no. 40573-F . Genl., dated the 24th December 1932.)

33.      Section 46. – A copy made under this section is not liable to stamp duty,---vide exemption (a) to article 24, schedule I-A.

34.      Section 47. –Subject to section 34 and section 35(b) , this section does not apply to receipts .

35.      Chapter V.--. Provision is made in this chapter for refund or renewal of stamps (1) when an impressed stamp has been spoiled ( Section 49),(2) when any person is possessed of a stamp which he does not require for use (section 54). Under section 49, refund or renewal can be granted only when the stamped paper alleged to be spoiled falls clearly within one of the several clauses of the section and application is made within the time prescribed in section 50.

Clause (a) provides for the case of a stamp inadvertently spoiled before any instrument has been executed on it .

Clause (b) for the stamp on any document which is written out wholly or in part, but which is not signed or executed by any party thereto.

Clause (c) for the cases of spoiled stamps used for certain bills of exchange or promissory notes.

Clause (d)  for any other spoiled impressed stamp on which an instrument has been duly executed .

Section 53 lays down the mode of making allowances for spoiled or misused stamps.

Section 54 allows a cash refund within 6 months of purchase on certain conditions in the case of stamps not required for immediate use and which have not been spoiled or rendered unfit for use. A deduction of one anna in the rupee is made, but while refunding the value of stamps returned by a licensed stamp vendor, the Collector should have regard to the orders contained in paragraph 41 infra.

Section 55 allows a refund upon the renewal of certain debentures of the stamp on the original or on the new debenture, whichever is less, but no other deduction is made. The original debenture must be produced and cancelled by the Collector , Section 51 authorises the Collector ( see note to that section ) to make refunds in the case of stamped printed forms no longer required by banks, etc. Here too, no deduction is made.

The procedure for the refund an renewal of stamps is contained in chapter 7 of Part III, while the authorities competent to sanction refunds and renewal and the condition under which refunds and renewal are admissible are given in Appendix A.

36.      Section 49.--- “impressed” stamps only are referred to in this section which terms includes impressed labels . as well as sheets( Section 2913)) and an unstamped document certified under section 32. In connection with clause(c) no refund can be granted in the case  of bill of exchange which  have been used as cover and sent to firms in England or home partners or directors, although such bills may not have been negotiated, ( Government of India Resolution no. 2696. Dated 7th June , 1889.) Refunds under sub-clause (6) of clause (d0 of this section are allowable independently of the refund rules in and under the ac itself in the case of stamps rendered useless solely in consequence of changes of law or rule . Sub clause (7) of clause (d) makes it clear that a person who throws aside an insufficiently stamped deed , and gets a new deed  in the same terms drawn up and properly stamped, is entitled to get a refund made to him of the duty which he first of all paid upon the insufficiently stamped and superseded deed . Registration does not ipso facto affect the right to refund the value of a stamp of a document which has been registered, and when refund is made in such a case, the registration office should be informed.( See also section 50.)

37.      Section 50.---Instances have occurred in which the limit has operated as a serious hardship. Local Governments have been authorized therefore to allow, or to delegate power to any subordinate Revenue-authority not below the rank of Collector or Deputy Commissioner, to allow refund or renewal of spoiled or useless stamps not required in cases where holders are unavoidable prevented from applying for refund or renewal within  the prescribed time . Deputy commissioner  have been  given authority to deal with applications for refund or renewal of spoilt or useless non-judicial stamps, provided application is made with 2 years of the date of purchase or the date on which the stamps were spoilt or rendered useless( Punjab Government letter no. 1622 ( Final.), dated 8th September 1908 ). Such discretion should , however , he very sparingly exercised and such allegations as ignorance of law with regard to limitation should not be allowed to constitute a special case. This applies to sections 52 and 54 also.

38.      Section 51. --- Refunds only are covered by this section. The section is of particular value when companies, etc., are wound up, and all their skeleton and other stamps forms becomes useless, No deduction is required under this section 9 Financial Commissioner’s no. 4209, dated 21st July 1900). The power has been delegated to Collectors ( Financial Commissioner’s notification no. 179, dated 29th September 1914)

39.      Section 52. ---- In every case the Collector must satisfy himself that the misuse was inadvertent. The section refers to stamps of all descriptions, but caution is necessary in refunding the value of adhesive stamps. ( see note to section 50.)

40.      Section 53.---Court fee stamps should not be granted in exchange for non-judicial stamps. The deduction required by clause(3) must be calculated on each stamp for which the allowance is claimed, not on the aggregate value of the stamps of the value of eight annas each ( or total of two rupees ) would  be four annas ( one anna on each) and not two annas only. Where, however, two or more impressed sheets or labels  are used to denote the stamp duty on single instrument in accordance with the rules in chapter 2 of this part they should , for the purpose of calculating the deduction , be treated as single stamp, In like manner, where a bill of exchange or promissory note is drawn in a set, the stamps on all the parts of the set should , for the  purpose of calculating the deduction , be treated as a single stamp, provided all the sets are surrendered for cancellation ( Financial Commissioner’s letter no. 1021, dated 9th February 1884). But where the allowance is made by means of refresh stamp, no such deduction should be made. Refunds on account of arms licensed , etc., refused are governed by special rule under the Acts concerned.

41.      Section 54.--- Good stamps , purchased more than six months previously,. Are often spoilt purposely--- an favourite method being be spilling oil or the contents of an ink-pot over them in order to obtain a refund under section 50, which allows of refund being made within sex moths of the date of spoiling . The spoiling may, of course, be accidental and the Collector, if satisfied of this, may make the refund; but it is often willful. The section referees to stamps of all descriptions, but great caution is necessary in refunding the value of adhesive stamps.

It has been rules by the Punjab Government in their notification no.  32769-F./G., dated 8th November 1930 “ that when stamps are returned into the Collector’s store on—

(1)   resignation of vendor’s license;

(2)   revocation of license for any fault of the licensee;

(3)   death of the vendor;

(4)   application of the vendor for leave to restore any stamps;

the stamps should be taken back at their full value less a deduction of one anna in the rupee; but that when they are returned on –

(5)   expiration of license;

(6)   recall of tamps by Government;

(7)   revocation of license for any other cause than that mentioned in (2);

they should be taken back at their full value less only any discount allowed on their sale to the licensed vendor.

42.      Section 55. – This section is intended to give facilities to companies in respect of renewals of  debentures. It should be noted, with reference to the proviso to the section, that rule 21 of the rules in chapter 2 of this part requires the Collector when making a refund under this section to “ cancel the original debenture by writing on, across it, the word ‘ cancelled ‘ and his usual signature with the date thereof .” No deduction should be made.

43.      Section 56. – All applications under clause(1) of this section for revision of orders of collectors in the Punjab should be made to the chief controlling revenue authority through the commissioner of the division (Punjab Government letter no. 314, dated the 6th January 1933.)

The intention of the orders is that although commissioners have no statutory authority , they should be associated as far as possible in the administration of the Stamp Act. When an application for revision of the ordered of a collector is  forwarded to the Financial Commissioner under section 56(1) of the stamp Act, the commissioner of the division should , after hearing the parties, if necessary, express his opinion on the case. ( Financial Commissioner’s letter no. 180/84, dated the 9th January 1935.)

44.      Section 57(1)(c).—The Punjab now has a governor . only doubt full cases should be referred to the High Court and the authority making the reference should express its opinion.

It may be noted that if the Collector has taken action under section 40(1) (b) and having received the deficient duty and penalty imposed, has certified under sub-section (1)(a) that the instrument before him is duly stamped, the effect of sub-section (2) is that the jurisdiction of the Chief Controlling Revenue – authority to refer to the High Court, whether  such instrument is in fact sufficiently stamped or not, is ousted.

A reference to the High Court under  section  57 (1) (b)  of the stamp Act can be made only when there is a case pending which is to be disposed of by the revenue authority on receipt of the judgment of the High Court, A reference to the High Court on mere abstract question when there is no case pending before the revenue authority for disposal is not competent

45.      Section 59.—“case” means a case that has not already been finally disposed of by the collector .

46.      Section 60. --- The reference under this section can only be made in the circumstances specified in it . The judge must feel doubt as to the amount of duty to be paid in respect of any instrument under proviso(a) to section 35. Section 60 does not deal with a case, where reference has been made to a collector and his adjudication obtained . Where a suit is dismissed with out being called to hearing no reference can be made as to a document produced in court by the plaintiff with  his plaint. ( Punjab law reporter 131 of 1906, F.B. Mt. Jai Devil Versus Gokul Chand.)

47.      Section 61. – This section gives appellate courts reversionary powers in respect of decisions of Criminal as well as of Civil and Revenue Courts in the case referred to them (vide Statement of Objects and Reasons). It may be pointed out here that  question of prosecution for an offence against the stamp law is to be decided by the Collector irrespective of any action of the revision court under section 61(1) of the stamp Act. ( Deputy Commissioner, Partapgarh V. Ram  Hark 93 I.C., page 909.)

No period of limitation has been prescribed for an application by a collector to an appellate court for revision of orders under this section, though a court will not  entertain  a stale application . Rustomji ‘s Law of Limitation , fourth edition at page 933. ( Financial Commissioner’s letter no. 5291-E. & S., dated the 30th August 1934.)

48.      Section 62. – Under this section, the question of intention does not arise. Compare sections 43,64,65(b) and 68.

49.      Section 64.—As gifts and settlements are generally one – sided transactions, either no value of the property is given, or a nominal value much lower than the real amount is stated in the instrument. Instruments of the class in question are duly stamped within the meaning of section 2(11) of the Stamp Act. If there was an intentional under-valuation or the document of its revenue, then a prosecution would protect the Government against this attempted fraud.

50.      Section 68.---if parties chose to divide their contracts so as to lesson the amount of stamps they may legally do so. Local officers should watch carefully against the practice of post-dating hundies or bills of exchange in order to evade payment of stamp duty and institute prosecutions in all cases in which conviction can be obtained (B.G.R. 6006,dated 5th December 1872 , Desai).

51.      Section 70.—see section 76-A. No delegation of power has been made by the local Government , See section 43 where the collector must come to a decision as to intentions. The collector may delegate his power to sanctions prosecutions. This is a separate matter merely for bringing the offender before the court.

The chief Controlling Revenue Authority has authorized all  Collectors generally to stay any prosecution or compound any offence arising under sections 63,65,and 69(a) . ( Financial Commissioner’s notification no. 116, dated 19th may 1910.)

52.      Section 71.--- The cases of offences under stamp Act are important and should ordinarily be tried by stipendiary magistrates familiar with the stamp rules, etc.

53.      Section 73.--- Rule 3, chapter 9, part III , authorises Collectors to permit stamp auditors to inspect records of public offices as contemplated by this section.

54.      Section 74.--- The rules framed by the local Government under this section will be found in chapter 5 of Part III and should be studied carefully.

55.      Section 75.—The rules issued by the Government of India are contained in chapter 2 of this part and chapter 1 of part III and should be noted carefully.

56.      Section 76(2).—It should be noted that the  rules have the force of law. Hence the penal clauses are applicable . ( See section 68 (c).)

57.       Section 76-A .—Powers have been delegated to Commissioners of divisions in the Punjab to grant refunds to a certain extent under section 45 of the stamp Act --- se paragraph 32  supra. (Punjab Government Notification no. 40573 –F. Genl.,dated the 24th December 1932.)

B—Notes on Articles of Schedule I and I-A of  the Stamp Act.

58.       (Article 1) Acknowledgment. - One of the most common confusions arises form the failure to discern whether an entry in an account book is a bond or a mere acknowledgement . An entry in an account book purports to sum up the former dealings between a money lender and his client. The entry is always alluded to as “ striking of balance.” The amount due is invariably stated, Then follows a  statement that a debtor acknowledges that this sum is due. If the entry contained nothing further and was signed by the debtor ore by an agent duly authorised in this behalf, it shall be an acknowledgment such as is contemplated by section 19 of the Limitation Act.

But besides a mere acknowledgement , the entry in the account books may recite that the debtor will pay the amount found due. If so, tee will be clearly an additional element of a true bond. Reverting to the analysis of the requisites of a bond ( notes to section 2(5), paragraph 2(iv) ante) it  would appear that such an entry would be certainly in writing and signed by the obligor, containing at the same time a distinct agreement by which the obligor binds himself to pay something to the obligee. If , however , it is not attested by a witness, it is not a bond , It is merely an agreement. The difference between a bond and an agreement is substantial. The stamp required on bond is different from that required on a mere agreement , and the penalties are different.

The entry, however, may not contain a specific promise to pay, and yet there may be an implied promise. There may , however, be something added to the acknowledgement  which , while not a specific  promise in so many words to pay the amount, yet shows that the debtor contemplated paying the amount and in a way expressed his intention to do so. For instance, while the ordinary wording of an acknowledgement is “ Rs. 100 baki dena,” i.e. Rs 100 remain due to be paid – words which have been held not to contain promise --- it will be found that Rs. 100 baki dena rakhta hun, a distinct promise that the money will be paid . here the bond is complete (provided, of course, that it is signed and attested), Again there are entries which record that interest is payable on the balance found due. The courts have held that the fact that the debtor expressed his willingness to pay interest amounts to a promise to pay the principal . The statement as to interest is very often the ratio decdidend when determining whether an entry In an account book is a mere acknowledgement or is in fact an agreement.

Every instrument has be considered on its own merits, If any words importing an agreement be added, an acknowledgement  loses its character as much and becomes an agreement, or if witnessed it becomes a bond.

.

59.       (Article 2). Administration  Bond - An administration bond is simply a bond given by a person securing the due administration of property entrusted to him by an order of the court.

60.       (Article 3) Adoption-deed. - A  document executed by A in favour of B authorising the latter to adopt his son is not liable to duty under this article as it is merely the parents consent to the adoption  and confers no authority to adopt.( Bengal Stamp Manual)

61.       (Article 4) Affidavit – Declarations made by soldiers who enlist under assumed names added to the Regimental Records are liable to stamp duty of two rupees under this article ( Financial Commissioner’s letter no. 4390, dated 1st August 1887)

The exemption does not apply to any officers of the Customs, Income Tax and Salt Departments, as they cannot be described as “ Revenue Courts” ( Government of India no. 4 F . 6-I stamps / 125, dated 15th April 1925.)

An election agent’s declaration requires no stamp ( Government of India Notification no. 88, dated 6th August 1921.)

62.       (Article 5.) Agreement.—See section 23-A , notes to section 2(5) and article I in paragraphs 2(iv) and 58 supra, table of reductions and remissions of stamp duty in chapter 1 and note to proviso to rule 10 (ii) in chapter 2 of this part.

63.       (Article 6) Agreement relating to deposit of title deeds, pawn or pledge. - This  article is intended to relate only to cases in which property is actually given in pledge. All transactions by which movable property is simply appropriated by way of security for the discharge of a debt or engagement without parting with its possession ( as, for example , bills of sale of stock in trade) are outside the scope of the article , and consequently are liable to the duty on mortgage deed as being instruments whereby one person transfers or creates to , or in favour of , another  a right over, or in respect of specified property ( Select Committee’s Report printed on page 231 of Part V of Gazette of India, 1898.).

64.       (Article 7) Appointment in execution of a power - The legal meaning of the term ”appointment” is the exercise of a  power conferred by a conveyance . Hence where a deed under article 58 provided for the appointment of five trustees and power was given to two of the five trustees to remove and discharge any of the trustees, and in exercise of that power these two trustees executed document discharging and removing two other trustees that document would fall under article 7. ( Financial Commissioner’s no. 4386 dated 13th June 1914 , to deputy Commissioner , Lahore.)

65.       (Article 12) Award.–This article refers to private awards only an award made by an order of a court in the course of a suit being excluded from the article . ( See article 45 and table of reductions etc., chapter 1 of this part.)

 

Contents   Next